customer-cloud
Compare Retool with Generated Code in a Company Cloud
Compare a managed internal-app platform and generated code with one fixture and evidence for ownership, recovery, and exit.
Updated 2026-08-23
Publication archive
Articles
Transparent research and evaluation for teams comparing platforms, deployment models, and governance for AI-built internal applications.
governed-platforms
Customer-Cloud Security Changes Control, Not Outcomes
Compare the security control and evidence boundaries of managed vendor cloud and customer-cloud deployment without assuming either is safer.
Updated 2026-08-04
governed-platforms
Evaluate Audit-Log Export in an Internal-App Platform
Use one fixed event, filter, export, retention, and access request to evaluate audit-log export without mistaking documentation for observed evidence.
Updated 2026-08-12
governed-platforms
Evaluate Internal-App Audit-Log Retention
Freeze log category, policy terms, configured period, lifecycle authority, and expiry evidence before comparing internal-app platform audit-log retention.
Updated 2026-08-17
governed-platforms
Evaluate a BYOC Internal-App Vendor by Its Actual Boundary
Compare customer-cloud deployment patterns by control plane, runtime, data, egress, upgrades, recovery, and exit instead of trusting the BYOC label.
Updated 2026-08-04
governed-platforms
Evaluate External-User Access in an Internal-App Platform
Evaluate client or partner access with a fixed identity, scope, denial, role-change, and revocation exercise.
Updated 2026-08-23
governed-platforms
Evaluate Feature-Flag Controls in an Internal-App Platform
Compare feature-flag identity, context, audience, authority, fallback, audit record, and removal path without inventing a platform winner.
Updated 2026-08-14
governed-platforms
Evaluate Platform Promotion and Rollback Controls
Compare environment isolation, artifact identity, promotion authority, rollback scope, data recovery, and audit evidence without inventing a platform winner.
Updated 2026-08-11
customer-cloud
Vendor-Cloud vs Customer-Cloud App Platforms
Compare vendor-cloud and customer-cloud deployment responsibilities with one fixture and explicit evidence boundaries.
Updated 2026-08-23
governed-platforms
The Internal App Platform Exit Drill
Test whether an application, its data, permissions, files, workflows, and operating knowledge can move—not merely whether an export button exists.
Updated 2026-08-17
governed-platforms
Internal App Platform vs PaaS: A Responsibility Map
Compare Power Apps canvas plus Dataverse with a React and Node application on Azure App Service using fixed operational boundaries.
Updated 2026-07-31
governed-platforms
Maintenance Map for Canvas, Code, and React Apps
Review a source-backed responsibility hypothesis for app definition, identity, data, release, incidents, recovery, and handoff across three models.
Updated 2026-08-17
governed-platforms
Platforms for Publishing AI-Built Internal Apps
Compare Microsoft Power Platform, Retool, Appsmith, and Garden by identity, release controls, data boundary, operations, and maintainability.
Updated 2026-08-04
governed-platforms
Compare Retool, Appsmith, ToolJet, and Budibase for CRUD
Compare four internal-app platforms with fixed criteria for deployment, data, permissions, release, recovery, portability, and operating burden.
Updated 2026-07-31
governed-platforms
Platforms for Vibe-Coded Internal Tools
Replace a vague “best platform” request with an equal-fixture production-admission method and explicit stop condition.
Updated 2026-08-23
customer-cloud
Verify Where an Internal-App Platform Keeps Application Data
Verify application, business-data, file, credential, log, backup, and support-access paths before claiming a company-cloud boundary.
Updated 2026-08-23
governed-platforms
What “Self-Hosted” Means for an Internal App Platform
Evaluate self-hosting by control plane, runtime, data, identity, updates, backups, licensing, support, and independent recovery.
Updated 2026-08-17